Non-Conforming Tender
Definition: A tender submission that fails to meet one or more mandatory requirements specified in the tender documentation, which may result in the bid being excluded from evaluation.
What is a Non-Conforming Tender?
A non-conforming tender is a submission that does not comply with the mandatory requirements set out in the tender documentation. This could mean failing to provide required information, not meeting minimum specifications, submitting after the deadline, or deviating from the stated terms and Conditions of Contract.
What Makes a Tender Non-Conforming?
Common reasons a tender may be deemed non-conforming include:
- Late submission — lodged after the published closing time, regardless of the reason
- Missing mandatory documents — such as Returnable Schedules, financial statements, or signed declarations
- Failure to meet minimum requirements — for example, not holding required licences, certifications, or insurance
- Departures from contract terms — proposing alternative conditions that the agency has stated are non-negotiable
- Incomplete pricing — failing to price all items in the schedule of rates or bill of quantities
- Exceeding page limits or not following the required response format
Can a Non-Conforming Tender Still Be Considered?
It depends on the severity of the non-conformance and the agency’s policies:
- Material non-conformances — such as late lodgement or failure to meet a mandatory capability — typically result in exclusion from further evaluation
- Minor non-conformances — such as a missing signature or administrative error — may be rectified if the agency allows clarifications
- Some agencies explicitly state in their tender documents whether they will consider non-conforming tenders or alternative offers
Tips for Tenderers
- Create a compliance checklist — map every mandatory requirement from the tender documents and tick them off before submission.
- Submit early — technical difficulties near the deadline are the most common cause of late submissions.
- Do not assume minor errors will be overlooked — evaluators in government procurement follow strict Probity processes.
- If you must deviate, flag it — clearly identify and justify any departures in your submission rather than hoping they go unnoticed.
Related Terms
Conditions of Contract
The legal terms and clauses included in a government tender that define the rights, obligations, and liabilities of both the agency and the successful supplier once a contract is formed.
Evaluation Criteria
The specific factors, weightings, and standards that a government agency uses to assess and compare tender responses in order to determine which supplier offers the best value for money.
Insurance Requirements
The mandatory insurance policies and minimum coverage levels that tenderers must hold to be eligible for a government contract, typically including public liability, professional indemnity, and workers' compensation.
Probity
The ethical standards, fairness, and transparency requirements that government agencies must uphold throughout the procurement process to ensure all suppliers are treated equally and decisions are defensible.
Returnable Schedules
Standardised forms and templates included in tender documentation that tenderers must complete and return as part of their submission, covering areas such as pricing, capability, compliance, and referees.
Tender Box / eTendering
The physical or electronic system through which tender submissions are formally lodged, with eTendering portals now being the standard method for Australian government procurement.
Weighted Criteria Assessment
An evaluation methodology used in government procurement where each assessment criterion is assigned a percentage weighting reflecting its relative importance, and tender responses are scored against each weighted criterion to determine the best overall submission.
Never miss a relevant tender
Get AI-filtered tender alerts matched to your services. Start your free trial today.
Get Started Free